Heterosexual Bisexual Homosexual

When I think of the above terms I tend to imagine a horizontal line with straight on the one end, gay on the other end, bi smack in the middle. I think all off us fall somewhere on that line and that our coordinates on the line is as unique as our fingerprints. I have met some complete gay men. I’ve met some complete straight women. I’ve met people who have been married or engaged to the opposite sex only to decide later on that they prefer their own sex. When asked, they would still me how completely they loved their opposite sex partner.

All of this usually leaves me to think of gender roles and how the whole thing works. How our sexuality is linked to our gender role and how we sometimes live out or grandparent’s version of what a “nice girl” should be to sometimes living out a role that has never been defined and is often scorned by traditional gender roles.

“Middlesex” by Jeffrey Eugines was one of the novels that made me aware of the programming that goes hand in hand with being female. The hero of his novel is a hermaphrodite that lives the first half of his/her life (including puberty) as a girl, since that is what his/her parents believed she/he was and at the age of about 17 decides to life as a man and claim both sexuality and gender role. The novel explores the little differences between the sexes like how you would check if something is stuck under your shoe (do you kick you leg up behind you and look over your shoulder like a girl or bend your leg at the knee in front of you like a boy) to the vast differences like having periods.

More recently I read “Kafka on the Shore” by Haruki Murakami. One of the characters in this WONDERFUL novel is Oshima who is a female living like a man but still likes men. A heterosexual gay in his/her own words.

These novels leave me questioning my own coordinates on the gay-straight line. And like always I end up wishing for androgyny and dual sex evolution.

Comments

Anonymous said…
What I wouldn't do for a touch of the old asexuality. I think of all the *sexualities, it's the least trainable.
dai said…
it's so obscure, i could not fit it into my paradigm.
Anonymous said…
miskien loop a-seksualiteit parralel (spelling?) met die ander lyn. 'n lyntjie totally op sy eie. persoonlik dink ek dat mentally is ek bisexual and physically beslis homosexual. en my asexual self op die ander lyn is erens besig om 'n baie uncomplicated lewe te lei.
Do Kwang said…
Daleen, hierdie is nou 'n probleem, want ek het sopas vir jou die ideale man gevind.
dai said…
regitg? wie is hy? ek dink jesus is die ideale man vir my.
Do Kwang said…
Daleen, ek het regtig 'n plan met jou.
Op 'n ander noot: Ek dink aseksualiteit is nie op daai kontinuim nie omdat dit die een ding is waarvoor ons samelewing nie plek het nie. As jy nie besig is om met iets of iemand seks te he^ nie het jy 'n probleem, dis iets om oor te swyg en skaam te wees. Aseksueel is die nuwe gay.
Anonymous said…
to all concerned.....i think the problem in the discussion is that we are thinking 1 dimensionally i.e. a straight line. we live a multi dimensional world, of which 1,2 and 3 dimensions are described by math, science etc. the fouth beign explored. a multitude of other dimension exists. maybe trying to pin it down into one dimension limits our view. maybe we should agree on the fact that sexuality is as unique as our finger prints and that asexuality is a cop out...:)
Do Kwang said…
Maar as jy se^ aseksueel is 'n cop out, dan contradict jy alles wat jy in die res van jou comment se^. As elkeen se seksualiteit uniek is, hoekom is dit dan net die seksualiteite wat deur Anton goedgekeur word wat okay is?
Do Kwang said…
Hoekom is 'n straight mens 'n vark as hy of sy vir gay mense vertel hulle is wanaangepas? Maar as iemand vir aseksuele mense vertel hulle het 'n probleem, dan is dit okay? Ek verstaan dit nie.
Ek dink nie mense kom ooit verby seksuele diskriminasie nie, hulle vind net nuwe groepe om te stigmatiseer.
Skuus as ek nou te lank aangaan, ek wou nie hierdie gesprek oorheers nie. Dis net vir my interessant, die hele gedagte. Ek meen wat gebeur nou as jy net iemand is wat eerlikwaar nie seksuele kontak in jou lewe wil he^ nie? Wat gaan jy wees? Jy gaan bietjie wees soos The Only Gay in the Village in Little Britain, behalwe jy gaan nie eens 'n gay wees nie, jy is iets anders waarvoor daar nie eens 'n naam is nie. Jy gaan alleen wees tussen mense wat anders as jy is en wat die hele tyd vir jou vertel daar is iets verkeerd met jou. En al iemand wat jy gaan he^ om jou gerus te stel dat jy okay is, is jyself. Dis ook maar 'n kak deal. Dis eensaam - nie die feit dat jy sonder seks gaan wees nie, maar die feit dat niemand wil he^ jy moet wees wie jy is nie en die hele tyd vir jou vertel jy is 'n freak.
PS: Daleen, ek het eintlik twee ouens vir jou in gedagte, jy kan pick and choose.
PienkZuit said…
Die vraag is : Wat dink Bush van Asexual Marriage? Moet ons wette maak om dit te verbied? Ek dink so, dis net wreed en niks anders nie!
nico said…
Ek was ook mal oor Middlesex.